How the TMO Has Changed the Game of Rugby | WanejoBets

From a try-scoring backstop to the bunker system, the Television Match Official has reshaped how rugby is refereed, watched and bet on. Here is what changed and what it cost.

September 19, 2026
8:41 am

Rugby was the first major team sport to hand a referee a television screen. The Television Match Official arrived to answer one narrow question — was the ball grounded? — and has since grown into something that shapes how matches are refereed, watched and wagered on. Not everyone thinks that growth has been for the better.

What the TMO Actually Is

The TMO is an additional match official who reviews video footage and advises the on-field referee. Sitting in a broadcast truck or dedicated booth with access to every camera angle, the TMO can be consulted by the referee or, within defined limits, can intervene.

Crucially, the TMO advises. The referee retains the decision. In practice, that distinction has become blurrier than the laws suggest.

The Original Remit: Grounding

When the TMO was introduced, the brief was narrow. Did the ball touch the line? Was the player’s foot in touch? Simple binary questions with a visual answer, in the in-goal area only.

It worked. A category of genuinely unresolvable disputes disappeared almost overnight, and nobody argued much about the cost.

The Expansion

The remit widened steadily. The TMO now routinely reviews:

Foul play — high tackles, dangerous clearouts, contact with the head
Acts in the build-up to a try, within a defined window of phases
Offside and obstruction in the lead-up
Knock-ons preceding a score

That expansion is where the arguments started. Reviewing whether a ball was grounded takes seconds. Reviewing whether a shoulder made contact with a head three phases earlier, at what height, with what degree of mitigation, can take minutes — and produces a judgement call rather than a fact.

What the TMO Has Changed

Player Safety

The strongest argument in its favour. High tackles that would once have gone unseen are now routinely punished, and the deterrent effect on tackle height has been real and measurable. Given what the sport now understands about head injury, that alone justifies the technology.

Accuracy Over Flow

More decisions are correct. Fewer matches are settled by an error nobody could see in real time. The trade is momentum — a match stopping for four minutes while a decision is unpicked frame by frame is a different spectacle to one that flows.

The Referee’s Authority

An unintended consequence. When every significant decision can be reviewed, on-field authority softens. Referees increasingly defer rather than decide, and players appeal to the screen rather than the whistle.

The Bunker: Rugby’s Attempt to Fix Its Own Fix

World Rugby’s most significant recent innovation addresses the delay problem directly. Under the bunker system, a referee issuing a yellow card for potential foul play can send the incident to an off-field official, who reviews it while play continues. Within eight minutes, the bunker upgrades the card to red or confirms the yellow.

Trialled at age-grade level before being adopted in senior rugby, the concept borrowed from rugby league’s long-established NRL bunker. It keeps the match moving while still allowing proper scrutiny.

It has not been universally welcomed. Some senior referees have called the system a mistake, arguing it removes decisions from the person best placed to judge the context of a match.

Join WanejoBets Today — Winna Wena Manje!

Back the Springboks, the Currie Cup and every major rugby fixture with sharp odds and live betting. Sign-up takes under two minutes. 18+ only.

What It Means for Rugby Bettors

The TMO has changed the betting landscape in ways that are easy to overlook. If you follow rugby markets at WanejoBets, these are the practical effects:

Card markets have become far more live. Systematic foul-play review means more yellows and reds than a decade ago. Card markets that once looked like novelties now carry genuine value.
A red card reshapes a match. Fourteen against fifteen for an extended period moves handicap and total-points lines sharply. In-play markets react — sometimes slowly.
Disallowed tries create in-play swings. A try ruled out on review moves live prices immediately. Bettors watching the broadcast see the replay before the market fully adjusts.
Bunker decisions leave an eight-minute window in which the outcome of a card is genuinely unknown. That uncertainty is priced imperfectly.
Matches take longer. More stoppage time means more opportunity for late scores, which matters for total-points and winning-margin markets.

The Case Against

Critics make three arguments, and all three have force:

It breaks the rhythm. Rugby’s appeal is continuity. Long reviews destroy it, and crowds notice.
It has not ended controversy. It has relocated it. Arguments about whether the referee saw something have become arguments about whether the TMO interpreted it correctly.
Consistency remains elusive. Similar incidents produce different outcomes depending on who is in the booth — which undermines the whole premise.

Where It Goes Next

The direction of travel is toward faster review, not less of it. The bunker is the clearest example: keep the scrutiny, remove the stoppage. Expect further refinement of what the TMO may intervene on unprompted, and tighter limits on how far back into the phase count a review can reach.

What will not happen is a return to the referee alone. The player-safety argument has settled that permanently.

Final Word

The TMO has made rugby fairer and safer, and it has made it slower and more argumentative. Both statements are true. The bunker is an honest attempt to keep the first set of benefits while reducing the second cost — and whether it succeeds will shape how the next decade of the sport is refereed.

Following every Test and Currie Cup fixture? Join WanejoBets today and sign up here.

Sources

Important Information

Wanejo Technology (Pty) Ltd trading as WanejoBets (2016/038364/07) is licensed by the Eastern Cape Gambling Board, Bookmakers Licence Number: ECBM017 (issued September 30, 2022).

18+ Only: No persons under 18 years are permitted to gamble at WanejoBets.

Responsible Gaming: Gaming should be fun. It should never cause financial hardship. Only bet money you can afford to lose.

Contact Support:
Email: support@wanejobets.co.za
Phone: 010 157 2725
WhatsApp: +27 73 698 1869

Get Help For Problem Gambling:
National Gambling Programme: 0800 006 008 (24/7, Free, Confidential)
WhatsApp: Text “HELP” to 0766 750710

Warning: Gambling carries financial risk. Play responsibly.